Discrimination

 

DISCRIMINATION


In re Majewski, 310 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 2002)


§ 525 is not applicable to a person who announces his intention to file for bankruptcy, but


has not yet filed.


In re Turner, 199 B.R. 694 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1996)


Because satisfaction of the debt is irrelevant for purposes of § 525(a), the court properly


refused to hear evidence that the debt was satisfied. This conclusion encompasses Turner’s


contention that the court should not have dismissed her case before requiring the DRE to comply


with her discovery requests. Since the court properly determined that there were no facts Turner


could prove that would give her relief under § 525(a), discovery was irrelevant.


160

Copyright

2012 Kedikian & Kedikian

Debt Relief Agency

We are attorneys that provide legal advice and service in the area of Bankruptcy Law. We are federally designated as debt relief agent.